Search for: All records

How energy is converted into thermal energy in weakly collisional and collisionless plasma processes, such as magnetic reconnection and plasma turbulence, has recently been the subject of intense scrutiny. The pressure–strain interaction has emerged as an important piece, as it describes the rate of conversion between bulk flow and thermal energy density. In two companion studies, we presented an alternate decomposition of the pressure–strain interaction to isolate the effects of converging/diverging flow and flow shear instead of compressible and incompressible flow, and we derived the pressure–strain interaction in magnetic field-aligned coordinates. Here, we use these results to study pressure–strain interaction during two-dimensional anti-parallel magnetic reconnection. We perform particle-in-cell simulations and plot the decompositions in both Cartesian and magnetic field-aligned coordinates. We identify the mechanisms contributing to positive and negative pressure–strain interaction during reconnection. This study provides a roadmap for interpreting numerical and observational data of the pressure–strain interaction, which should be important for studies of reconnection, turbulence, and collisionless shocks.

The pressure–strain interaction describes the rate per unit volume that energy is converted between bulk flow and thermal energy in neutral fluids or plasmas. The term has been written as a sum of the pressure dilatation and the collisionless analog of viscous heating referred to as Pi−D, which isolates the power density due to compressible and incompressible effects, respectively. It has been shown that Pi−D can be negative, which makes its identification as collisionless viscous heating troubling. We argue that an alternate decomposition of pressure–strain interaction can be useful for interpreting the underlying physics. Since Pi−D contains both normal deformation and shear deformation, we propose grouping the normal deformation with the pressure dilatation to describe the power density due to converging/diverging flows, with the balance describing the power density purely due to shear deformation. We then develop a kinetic theory interpretation of compression, normal deformation, and shear deformation. We use the results to determine the physical mechanisms that can make Pi−D negative. We argue that both decompositions can be useful for the study of energy conversion in weakly collisional or collisionless fluids and plasmas, and implications are discussed.

In weakly collisional and collisionless magnetized plasmas, the pressure–strain interaction describes the rate of conversion between bulk flow and thermal energy density. In this study, we derive an analytical expression for the pressure–strain interaction in a coordinate system with an axis aligned with the local magnetic field. The result is eight groups of terms corresponding to different physical mechanisms that can contribute to the pressure–strain interaction. We provide a physical description of each term. The results are immediately of interest to weakly collisional and collisionless magnetized plasmas and the fundamental processes that happen therein, including magnetic reconnection, magnetized plasma turbulence, and collisionless shocks. The terms in the field-aligned coordinate decomposition are likely accessible to measurement with satellite observations.

Magnetic reconnection in naturally occurring and laboratory settings often begins locally and elongates, or spreads, in the direction perpendicular to the plane of reconnection. Previous work has largely focused on current sheets with a uniform thickness, for which the predicted spreading speed for anti‐parallel reconnection is the local speed of the current carriers. We derive a scaling theory of three‐dimensional (3D) spreading of collisionless anti‐parallel reconnection in a current sheet with its thickness varying in the out‐of‐plane direction, both for spreading from a thinner to thicker region and a thicker to thinner region. We derive an expression for calculating the time it takes for spreading to occur for a current sheet with a given profile of its thickness. A key result is that when reconnection spreads from a thinner to a thicker region, the spreading speed in the thicker region is slower than both the Alfvén speed and the speed of the local current carriers by a factor of the ratio of thin to thick current sheet thicknesses. This is important because magnetospheric and solar observations have previously measured the spreading speed to be slower than previously predicted, so the present mechanism might explain this feature. We confirm the theory via a parametric study using 3D two‐fluid numerical simulations. We use the prediction to calculate the time scale for reconnection spreading in Earth's magnetotail during geomagnetic activity. The results are also potentially important for understanding reconnection spreading in solar flares and the dayside magnetopause of Earth and other planets.

Using incoherent Thomson scattering, electron heating and acceleration at the electron velocity distribution function (EVDF) level are investigated during electron-only reconnection in the PHAse Space MApping (PHASMA) facility. Reconnection arises during the merger of two kink-free flux ropes. Both push and pull type reconnection occur in a single discharge. Electron heating is localized around the separatrix, and the electron temperature increases continuously along the separatrix with distance from the X-line. The local measured gain in enthalpy flux is up to 70% of the incoming Poynting flux. Notably, non-Maxwellian EVDFs comprised of a warm bulk population and a cold beam are directly measured during the electron-only reconnection. The electron beam velocity is comparable to, and scales with, electron Alfvén speed, revealing the signature of electron acceleration caused by electron-only reconnection. The observation of oppositely directed electron beams on either side of the X-point provides “smoking-gun” evidence of the occurrence of electron-only reconnection in PHASMA. 2D particle-in-cell simulations agree well with the laboratory measurements. The measured conversion of Poynting flux into electron enthalpy is consistent with recent observations of electron-only reconnection in the magnetosheath [Phan et al., Nature 557, 202 (2018)] at similar dimensionless parameters as in the experiments. The laboratory measurements go beyond the magnetosheath observations by directly resolving the electron temperature gain.